<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NextGen Aligner Focus Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html</link>
	<description>Medical genomics in the post-genome era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roald Forsberg</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Roald Forsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-115</guid>
		<description>We believe that we have a very strong assembler for short reads.
You can get the white paper of our website http://www.clcbio.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We believe that we have a very strong assembler for short reads.<br />
You can get the white paper of our website <a href="http://www.clcbio.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.clcbio.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zee</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-114</guid>
		<description>In case anybody&#039;s interested in trying novocraft,  the aligners (novopaired + novoalign)  is free for use an can be downloaded at  www.novocraft.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anybody&#8217;s interested in trying novocraft,  the aligners (novopaired + novoalign)  is free for use an can be downloaded at  <a href="http://www.novocraft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.novocraft.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Fairly a good list! In addition, it seems to me that ZOOM (http://www.bioinformaticssolutions.com/products/ph/ZOOM.pdf) is another worthy candidate. It is developed by the group of people who wrote PatternHunter. In my view, it is a strong group.

ZOOM will be acadmic free and is going to be released in a few weeks, according to an email sent by that group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairly a good list! In addition, it seems to me that ZOOM (<a href="http://www.bioinformaticssolutions.com/products/ph/ZOOM.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.bioinformaticssolutions.com/products/ph/ZOOM.pdf</a>) is another worthy candidate. It is developed by the group of people who wrote PatternHunter. In my view, it is a strong group.</p>
<p>ZOOM will be acadmic free and is going to be released in a few weeks, according to an email sent by that group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benbfly</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>benbfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also heard Shrimp (http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/) gives good results (I am not affiliated and have not even tried it yet).  I know people who are using RMAP, so i think it&#039;s worth including.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also heard Shrimp (<a href="http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/" rel="nofollow">http://compbio.cs.toronto.edu/shrimp/</a>) gives good results (I am not affiliated and have not even tried it yet).  I know people who are using RMAP, so i think it&#8217;s worth including.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhui</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>jhui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-108</guid>
		<description>if possible, please include SeqMap(http://biogibbs.stanford.edu/~jiangh/SeqMap/) into the list. It works like ELand, but can do 3 or more mismatches and also ins/del.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if possible, please include SeqMap(http://biogibbs.stanford.edu/~jiangh/SeqMap/) into the list. It works like ELand, but can do 3 or more mismatches and also ins/del.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://massgenomics.org/2008/06/nextgen-aligner-focus-group.html/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massgenomics.org/?p=35#comment-107</guid>
		<description>My friends at GTO picked up this entry in their Daily Scan: http://www.genome-technology.com/issues/blog/general/147733-1.html

They noted that the aligners we&#039;re testing &quot;include Maq, Eland, BLAT, and cross_match.&quot;  In fairness, we&#039;re also looking at a few others in the first evaluation.  Here&#039;s the list of prioritized aligners by sequencing platform:  

Illumina/Solexa Data
-Maq
-Eland
-New CrossMatch
-SlimSearch
-Novocraft
-Mosaik

Roche/454 Data
-BLAT
-New CM
-Mosaik
-GsMapper
-SynaSearch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friends at GTO picked up this entry in their Daily Scan: <a href="http://www.genome-technology.com/issues/blog/general/147733-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.genome-technology.com/issues/blog/general/147733-1.html</a></p>
<p>They noted that the aligners we&#8217;re testing &#8220;include Maq, Eland, BLAT, and cross_match.&#8221;  In fairness, we&#8217;re also looking at a few others in the first evaluation.  Here&#8217;s the list of prioritized aligners by sequencing platform:  </p>
<p>Illumina/Solexa Data<br />
-Maq<br />
-Eland<br />
-New CrossMatch<br />
-SlimSearch<br />
-Novocraft<br />
-Mosaik</p>
<p>Roche/454 Data<br />
-BLAT<br />
-New CM<br />
-Mosaik<br />
-GsMapper<br />
-SynaSearch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

